Short things, kept in the open. A commonplace book, formerly rabbitholes.garden.

The real change India needs is for people to clean up after themselves and to maintain things. We’ll go a long way if we just maintain what’s already built. A cult of preservation and maintenance is underrated. Building things is sexy; preserving and maintaining them is not.

They seem to be living in an era where if you don’t have the ability to change your opinion on something on a dime, you’re toast.

We live in exponential times and we need exponential mental models to navigate these disturbing, treacherous, exciting, wonderful, shocking, and scary times.

“Rage economy” is a really nice framing:

A snippet from this Hindu article with an excerpt from Rama Chandra Guha’s Arguments with Gandhi: Ambedkar saw Gandhi as a timid and hesitant reformer. Orthodox Hindus, on the other hand, saw Gandhi as a dangerous revolutionary attacking the very basis of scripture and tradition. This disjuncture in viewpoints brings…

Nice note from BlackRock: Outside China, the key question is whether companies use Chinese technology or compete against it. Cheaper Chinese industrial robots and machinery can boost productivity and ease labor shortages for their customers. For rival producers, the economics are less appealing. European machinery…

Raghuram Rajan on industrial policy:

I’d say that I am not against the government’s actions; I am very much for the government’s actions on dealing with the fundamentals. So let’s focus on public goods such as education and healthcare, let’s focus on building good roads, let’s focus on creating a good business environment, let’s focus on utilities, let’s focus on water, electricity, logistics. These are areas where you have a much better chance of success improving things rather than [picking winners and sectors].

Whenever our government showers a sector with love, it has not ended particularly well except for the areas I just mentioned. Kudos to the current government for building out Indian infrastructure. That’s great. But I think if you test them on manufacturing, have they really created more manufacturing jobs? The line is flat [on the chart]. Look at the line. I’d say that just the evidence suggests that we have not been great. Maybe some other countries have seen success.

The weight loss revolution in India seems to be doing ok?

And right on cue, the fakes have arrived on the scene:

Spurious drugs are a recurring problem in India, said Mahesh Zagade, a former commissioner of the Maharashtra Food and Drug Administration. He said that while the country’s laws are robust, implementation and enforcement have been lacking. Short-staffed regulators, the possibility of corruption, and easy access to raw materials have contributed to the problem, in his view. “This is a failure of the official machinery,” he said, adding that until action is taken to fix the broader system, “this situation is just not going to improve.”

What a legend. Came across the name for the first time in India after Gandhi: With the enactment of the Government of India Act 1935, the couple joined the Muslim League and entered electoral politics. In the 1937 elections, she was one of the few women who successfully contested from a non-reserved seat and was…

Today in learning: In his first book, The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (1965), he theorized that what stimulates people to act in groups is incentive; members of large groups do not act in accordance with a common interest unless motivated by personal gain (economic, social, etc.).…

Valuations for cokeheads: Now, TAM is de rigueur in any venture capitalist’s slide deck or IPO prospectus. Its usefulness is another matter. Uber touted a $12.3tn TAM in its 2019 listing; its annual revenue today is less than $60bn. WeWork’s $3tn addressable market of office properties didn’t save it from bankruptcy.…

IMF on why Japan matters: The Japanese government bond market is among the world’s largest and deepest and remains an important safe haven for investors when conditions deteriorate. Combined with Japan’s open capital account, sizable international investments, and growing foreign participation—including in mutual funds…

To read:

One of India’s biggest digital vulnerabilities sits on a six-kilometre stretch of Mumbai’s Arabian Sea coast.

Around Versova, a densely populated neighbourhood on the city’s northwest, at least 13 of ++India’s 18 intercontinental submarine cables++ come ashore within six kilometres of one another.

Together they carry as much as 95% of India’s international bandwidth to Europe, Africa and West Asia.

“This network faces a critical vulnerability due to severe geographic concentration,” says Anwesha Sen of Takshashila Institution, a think tank.

Donald Trump is a man who lives by a singular philosophy: “Aaj kuchh tufani karte hain” (Let’s do something daredevil today).But sadly, his deep desire to be disruptive is completely at odds with what the world actually needs. Today, the entire planet is paying a steep price for his almost orgasmic fixation on…

As always another thoughtful and prescient post by Ruxandra Teslo.

If we want humans at all to be in charge in any way over the world, we need them to continue exercising their intellect and gaining mastery over intellectual domains. If we deplete the institutional and cultural resources that underpin that, in a generation or two our minds will atrophy and no human will be in charge of anything (or the world will be horrendous).

From DeepSeek’s paper: Post-Training PipelineIn this release, we refrain from introducing novel post-training algorithms. The overall recipe follows the standard paradigm of supervised fine-tuning (SFT) followed by reinforcement learning (RL) and on-policy distillation (OPD) [Gu et al., 2024; Lu and Lall, 2025]…

This sounds like a description of Somalia or some other hellhole, but it’s Sweden. Sweden!!

Gunnar Strömmer, Sweden’s justice minister, calls gang crime “a systematic threat to society” on a par with or above that posed by terrorism. On a visit to Gothenburg, Sweden’s second city, he notes that almost a year has gone by since a deadly shooting there.

So bad was the country’s reputation that politicians in neighbouring Denmark and Norway talked about “Swedish conditions” as shorthand for everything they did not want — spiralling crime after a period of almost unchecked immigration. Swedish gangs prospered, using digital platforms to offer 12, 13 and 14-year-olds cash to commit murders or bombings, at home or abroad.

“Crime has been one of our main exports,” says Alexander Wallenius, lead investigator at the police’s national operations department, of a country more used to touting the success of its start-ups or music industry. He adds that the “No shooting” headline “should be the normal. It is a sign that the trend has changed.”

This is quite interesting:

Now, you might think that broader participation in the stock market would increase the strength of the wealth effect, with more households exposed to market volatility. But this is not quite right. ++New research++ from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York finds that the more widely Americans hold shares, the weaker the effect of a rate change on the real economy, which is the opposite of what you might expect: instinctively, the more people who own stocks, the harder a market swing should hit spending.

In fact, what matters, according to Juan Morelli, a New York Fed researcher, is not how many people own stocks but how concentrated the ownership is. When only a sliver of households own stocks, equity exposure is concentrated among relatively few households. So if a rate rise hits share prices, the resulting wealth shock is larger for each participating household, prompting a bigger reduction in spending.

I thought this was a thoughtful response:

At a higher level, I guess I’d say there’s a sort of refusal to think carefully about what models are or are not useful for in a rigorous way which I find personally quite annoying, and instead a reliance on some nebulous notion of being “AGI pilled” as a replacement for serious thought. I think people are very quick to anthropomorphize LLM intelligence because humans communicate through words and we infer the intelligence of human counterparties through comprehension of their language, but this leads them to wrong conclusions; for example if we observe that a new model proved some incredible mathematical theorem, some will say, “well, don’t we have AGI now, huh?” But to me, it’s actually more like, “well, given how hard it would have been for a human to do these mathematics, and given the limited economic effect of LLMs upon the world so far, isn’t it actually a negative datapoint vis-a-vis the generality of LLM intelligence?”

Andrew Ho @andrewho03 · September 3, 2026 ↗Not really observations that others before me haven’t made, but: - Despite the seemingly magical nature of LLMs, reflection over a >3 month timescale suggests my total productivity hasn’t increased by over 100%, or perhaps even by over 50%, and a lot of time is actually wasted…

As always, thoughtful response from Philippe Lemoine:

Interesting:

India is ​preparing a framework that would let AI agents make small digital payments without approval for every ‌transaction, three sources familiar with the matter said, potentially making UPI one of the world’s largest networks with agentic payments.

While leading payment companies have launched such frameworks in the U.S., Europe, Singapore and Australia, a rollout on the popular Unified Payments Interface would ​also put India among the first countries to have a national infrastructure for agentic AI payments.

My thoughts on the topic:

/notes/2026-08-07-tell-your-agent-to-speak-to-my-agent/

The great Ben Evans posted this:

Posting for reference: the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory estimates 2023 US data centre water withdrawal at 66bn liters (17.4bn gallons). With all this investment, that might triple in the next few years. Big number!
But total US freshwater withdrawal is 102tr gallons a year. Data centres were about 0.017% of total US water withdrawal.
This can be a local planning issue, if you build in the wrong place. But the idea that AI overall is using lots of water is nonsense.
Sources: https://lnkd.in/gdnafw4z, https://lnkd.in/gaEmrn2T
Fun comparison: a kilo of almonds uses 10-15k liters of water, which is (roughly) a backyard swimming pool. A ChatGPT query uses a fraction of a teaspoon.
If you want, I can also transcribe the comments below the post or provide a direct summary of the argument being made. Let me know how you would like to proceed.

Heard DHH mention this on Lex Fridman’s podcast:

YouTube · youtube.com ↗DHH: Future of Programming, AI, Agentic Engineering, Vibe Coding & Linux | Lex Fridman Podcast #501Lex Fridman on YouTube

Grok bot can now buy things for you:

/notes/2026-08-07-tell-your-agent-to-speak-to-my-agent/

This is a clever paper. I didn’t know this. I mean, it seems obvious once you hear it, but I didn’t know it. Reading this reminded me of something I heard someone say, maybe Liv Boeree or someone like that, on a podcast. She said something to the effect that individual rationality can lead to collective irrationality.…

Here’s an interesting study regarding Indian women’s preference for sons and its impact on mental health: The researchers surveyed a sample of married women of reproductive age and their co-residing mother-in-law in Jaunpur district, Uttar Pradesh. When there was more than one daughter-in-law in the household, they…

This is an interesting post on small language models, and I completely agree. For most tasks people have, whether in an organizational setting or in a personal capacity, frontier or large models are overkill. It’s like using a chainsaw to slice a piece of bread.

Most of our everyday use cases, inside a company or personally, are basic in nature: search, summarize, transform, set simple alerts, synthesize things, ask basic questions, and so on. For all those use cases, we don’t need GPT-4 or Claude, Opus 5 or Table. Simple small models like Gemini Flash, GPT Luna, DeepSeek Flash, and now GLM 5.3 Flash are more than good enough—and they’re dirt cheap.

This also opens up a lot of use cases for building small tools and apps by leveraging the power of cheap LLM models that can—if not be a million-dollar SaaS business—at the bare minimum have a few hundred or thousand paying users. I would bet on an efflorescence of such small apps and tools.

There is a lot of commentary online about Google falling behind in the AI race, especially considering that its long-promised 3.5 Pro never came. Since then, they’ve launched a couple of new models in the Flash series. While 3.5 and 3.6 were criticized heavily, Gemini 3.7 Flash seems to be getting some favorable…

What a beautiful thought: seek better questions.

The adoption of Chinese AI models continues unabated:

As of Tuesday, DeepSeek-V4-Flash was the most-used model in terms of token volume, while Chinese models dominated the top five, including Step 3.7 Flash from StepFun, GLM-5.2 from Zhipu, or Z.ai, and DeepSeek-V4-Flash’s updated 0731 version, which ranked second, fourth and fifth, respectively. The third spot was taken by OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 Luna, Vercel data showed.

The figures indicate that developers are increasingly choosing cheaper and open models for production workloads, particularly for autonomous agents that can consume large numbers of tokens for reasoning, writing code and calling software tools.

Interesting debate on AI, bloom and doom involving a bunch of the usual suspects: